Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  93 / 135 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 135 Next Page
Page Background

HALF-YEAR REPORT 2016

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the six months ended 30 June 2016

/ 91

31 Contingent liabilities and commitments

(continued)

(e) Outstanding litigation and disputes

(continued)

(i) The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”) Investigation

(continued)

On 15 October 2014, the Secretary for the Financial Services and the Treasury said that the

Police’s investigation into the CITIC matters on aspects outside the subject matters of the

SFC’s actions are still ongoing.

In the absence of the findings of these proceedings and investigations being made available to

the Company and due to the inherent difficulties involved in attempting to predict the outcome

of such proceedings and investigations and in assessing the possible findings, the directors do

not have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of contingent liabilities (if

any) relating to such proceedings and investigations, the timing of the ultimate resolution of

those matters or what the eventual outcome may be. However, based on information currently

available, the directors are not aware of any matters arising from the above proceedings and

investigations that might have a material adverse financial impact on the consolidated financial

position or liquidity of the Group.

(ii) Mineralogy Disputes

The MRSLAs provide that royalties are payable to Mineralogy by each of Sino Iron and Korean

Steel on ore mined (Royalty Component A) and concentrate produced (Royalty Component B).

The MRSLAs also provide that, unless certain exceptions apply, a Minimum Production Royalty is

payable to Mineralogy by each of Sino Iron and Korean Steel where a minimum production level

was not achieved by a specified date.

Due to changes in the way in which seaborne-traded iron ore is priced, the Company considers

that it is no longer possible to calculate Royalty Component B. Mineralogy and its related

companies have commenced a number of proceedings against the Company, Sino Iron, Korean

Steel, Sino Iron Holdings Pty Ltd and certain officers of those companies containing or derived

from claims for Royalty Component B and/or the Minimum Production Royalty. A number of

those proceedings are described above in Note 3(b). To the extent those proceedings have not

been permanently stayed or dismissed, they are being vigorously contested by the Group. No

trial date has been set in the ongoing royalties proceedings.

In the circumstances, the Group does not consider that a reliable estimate can be made of

the amount of any potential liability arising from the royalties proceedings, and, therefore, no

provision has been recognised in the Accounts.

There are a number of disputes with Mineralogy. Refer to Note 3(b) for details.

(iii) CITIC Resources Holdings Limited (“CITIC Resources”) Litigation

(1) In August 2014,

山煤煤炭進出口有限公司

(Shanxi Coal Import & Export Co., Ltd.) (“Shanxi

Coal I/E”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of

山煤國際能源集團股份有限公司

(Shanxi Coal

International Energy Group Co., Ltd.) (“Shanxi Coal Int’l”), commenced a claim in

山西省

高級人民法院

(Shanxi High People’s Court) (the “Shanxi Court”) against, amongst others,

CITIC Australia Commodity Trading Pty Limited (“CACT”) (the “Claim A”). Shanxi Coal I/E is

claiming from CACT (i) the sum of US$89,755,000 (HK$700,089,000) plus interest for breach

of contract resulting from the alleged non-delivery of certain aluminium ingots by CACT to

Shanxi Coal I/E, and (ii) costs in respect of Claim A.